powerful search engine optimization
effective link popularity development

Below our informational pages about search engine marketing. All content provided by M. D. Conti, Search Engine Optimizer

--------------

Keywords

How to choose keywords

Keyword
prominence

SEO

The factors that play a role in your web site's ranking

Optimised
web-design

Search engines strategies

Optimized body description

Content is king

Invisible
text

Comment tag optimisation

Meta tag optimization

Title tag
optimisation

Hyperlink
URL tag optimisation

Alt tag optimisation

Getting your
PDF indexed

Alternative traffic promotion techniques

Copywriting

Creating effective body descriptions

Writing content: focus on your target audience!

Content is king

Writing a
business
website homepage

Actractive web
page titles

Links

Linking
tips

Linking
strategies

Trading
links

Link popularity development

Website's linking architecture

Automated linking software

16 rules for a good link exchange request

Pay per click

Pay-per-click: How to increase the
click-through-rate

Pay-per-click: PPC strategies

SEO versus PPC

Pay-per-click: PPC campaigns

Pay-per-click: Landing pages

Pay-per-click: PPC management

Pay-per-click search engines list

Pay-per-click:
how to avoid click fraud

How to improve effectiveness in PPC

Pay-per-click:
How to chose keywords

Pay-per-click:
Google AdWords

Pay-per-click: Google AdWords account structure

Pay-per-click: Yahoo Search Marketing (SM)

Yahoo SM
versus
Google AdWords

Domain names

Domain name strategies

Domain
registration
rules

Content
spidering

TDL: country top domain level

CIRCA technology: applied semantics to search engines

Latent semantic indexing (LSI)

Real simple syndication (RSS)

Block-level link analysis

Google

Google "jagger" update

Google "link" command

Google's ranking algorithm
part 1/4

Google's ranking algorithm
part 2/4

Google's ranking algorithm
part 3/4

Google's ranking algorithm
part 4/4

Google's
original
patent:
how Google
works

Google's
page rank

Google's sandbox: delayed inclusion of new websites

Google's penalties: getting penalized

Google's
sitemap
service

Google's
search
page

search engines

How search engines evaluate relevancy when ranking search results

How to be informed when a search engine spider visits your site

How to instruct
spiders by means
of the head-tag

How to prevent
duplicate content

How search engines work

Australian search engines list

World major search engine list

Web searchers' behaviour: shocking web users' statistics

Listing expectations: how much better is ranking No. 1 versus No. 10?

web marketing

Seven reasons
why customers
don't buy

12 ways to exceed your client's expectations every time!

Market reseach for new online business

How to set up your best customer profile

Web
Marketing
Plan

12 tips to build
a new SEO
Career

How to market your website: five keys to web site marketing success

How to market your website: the five web marketing laws

How to market your website: miscellaneous marketing strategies

How to market your website: a mixed marketing media approach

miscellaneous

Site
defacements

Link in a
new window

Are you cross-browser compatible? Learn how to do it

Javascript to let visitors bookmark your website

Why your web pages don't load fast enough

Javascript to open a link in a new window

Hexadecimal

Hexadecimal color codes

Decimal RGB color codes

 

Add a Link
Company Profile
Keyword Tracking
Search Engine Optimisation
Link Popularity Building
Pay Per Click - PPC
Links
Home


Impatient web searchers measure web sites' appeal in seconds

University Park, Pa. - Web users are picky and impatient, typically visiting only the first three results from a query, with one in five searchers spending 60 seconds or less on a linked Web document, according to Penn State researchers.

“People make instantaneous judgments about whether to stay on a site, and if a site doesn't the give the right impression, users will bypass it," said Dr. Jim Jansen, assistant professor in Penn State’s information sciences and technology (IST). "A page has to be well-designed, easy to load and relevant to a searcher's needs."

Otherwise, by the time three minutes have elapsed, 40 percent of searchers will have moved on. While some may have found what they wanted, others may simply have given up and moved to a different site, said the faculty member in Penn State’s School of Information Sciences and Technology (IST).

Jansen's conclusions are based on research that he and co-author Amanda Spink, Penn State associate professor of IST, conducted in February 2001. The two, reviewing users' actions in chronological order. The length of sessions, number of pages visited and re researchers analyzed more than 450,000 Web queries submitted to AlltheWeb.com in a 24-hour periodlevance of results were studied.

He presented the research today (June 25) in a paper titled "An Analysis of Web Documents Retrieved and Viewed" at the 2003 International Conference on Internet Computing in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Several patterns emerged. Half of all users entered only one query with 54 percent viewing just one page of results in each session (a session was a query or series of queries submitted by a user during one interaction with a Web search engine). Only an additional 19 percent went on to the second page in sessions, and fewer than 10 percent of users bothered with the third page of results.

A similar drop-off in numbers occurred when the researchers considered how many results searchers viewed per query. About 55 percent of users checked out one result only. More than 80 percent stopped after looking at three results.

With more businesses opting to market through search engines rather than ads, those percentages illustrate why a good ranking on a major Web search engine can make the difference between commercial success and failure.

To improve the odds Web users will visit a site, Jansen said it is imperative to get indexed by all search engines. A site's abstract that appears on the results page also can direct more users to a site -- provided the description is enticing and relevant specifics about the site are included.

"For site developers, if you want to be looked at, it is absolutely critical that the abstract be crystal clear about the purpose of your Web site," Jansen said. "Eight out of 10 times, the abstract dissuades people from going to the site."

The researchers had news for consumers, too: They have a valid reason to be frustrated sometimes with Web searches. One out of every two results isn't relevant to what the searcher was looking for, Jansen said.

"As good as search engines are, there is room for improvement," Jansen said. "Niche search engines that focus on a narrow topic or search engines that cluster results by finding similarities and grouping them may be consumers' best bet for improving relevancy."

Author: Dr. Jansen - jjansen@ist.psu.edu by email.

Back to top

Home | Site Map | Contact Us | Price List | Webmaster | Company Profile | Add a Link

Price List
Site Map
Contact Us
Webmaster